Waiting for Godot by Samuel Beckett

TOPIC OF THE BLOG:-

This blog is a part of a thinking activity on Waiting for Godot by Samuel Beckett given by Dilip Barad Sir from The English Department, MKBU, Bhavnagar. Check out Dilip Barad sir's Blog Site (Click here) for more information and knowledge about Waiting for Godot by Samuel Beckett and other works and writers. In this blog I am going to answer some questions given by Dilip sir in  Teacher's Blog (Click here).

SAMUEL BECKETT:-

You're on Earth, There's 

no cure for that.

Samuel Barclay Beckett was born on April 13?, 1906 in Foxrock, County Dublin, Ireland and died on December 22, 1989 in Paris, France. He was an author, critic, and playwright, winner of the Nobel Prize for Literature in 1969. He wrote in both French and English and is perhaps best known for his plays, especially 'En attendant Godot' (1952; Waiting for Godot). (Esslin)

QUESTIONS - ANSWERS OF THIS PLAY:- 

1.1. Why does Beckett grow a few leaves in Act II on the barren tree - The tree has four or five leaves?

• In the play Waiting for Godot, the appearance of a few leaves on the previously barren tree in Act II can be interpreted in different ways, depending on the reader's interpretation.
• One possible interpretation is that the leaves symbolize a glimmer of hope and renewal in an otherwise bleak and desolate world. The tree, which previously had no leaves, now has a few, indicating that life and growth are still possible, even in difficult circumstances. This could be seen as a metaphor for the human condition, where even in the midst of despair and uncertainty, there is always the potential for change and growth.
• Another interpretation is that the leaves are a mocking gesture, meant to taunt the characters who are waiting for someone or something to come and save them. The appearance of a few leaves may suggest that the tree is teasing the characters, offering them a small glimpse of hope only to take it away again, reinforcing the idea that their waiting is pointless and futile.

1.2.  Can we do any political reading of the play if we see European nations represented by the 'names' of the characters (Vladimir - Russia; Estragon - France; Pozzo - Italy and Lucky - England)? What interpretation can be inferred from the play written just after World War II? Which country stands for 'Godot'?

• Samuel Beckett's plays are renowned for their ambiguity and openness to interpretation. One can argue that political interpretation is a possible lens through which to view his works. For instance, his play "Waiting for Godot," written just after World War II, has been read in various ways. Some critics have suggested that the characters of Vladimir and Estragon could represent Russia and France, respectively, while Pozzo could be interpreted as Italy and Lucky as England.
• The interpretation of Godot as Germany and Hitler is another reading that has been proposed. In this view, Godot represents the destructive force of Germany, which caused widespread devastation during the war. The characters waiting for Godot, who are portrayed as soldiers and dictators, can be seen as a commentary on the blind devotion and loyalty of those who supported Hitler's regime. The play's title itself, "Waiting for Godot," can be read as a metaphor for the way in which people waited for Hitler to deliver them from their troubles.
• While this political interpretation is plausible, it is important to note that Beckett himself did not explicitly endorse it. The play's openness to multiple interpretations is what makes it a classic of modern drama. Ultimately, the meaning of "Waiting for Godot" is left up to the reader to decide, and different readers may find different meanings in the play's enigmatic characters and situations.

1.3. In Act I, in reply to Boy’s question:

BOY: What am I to tell Mr. Godot, Sir?

VLADIMIR: Tell him . . . (he hesitates) . . . tell him you saw us. (Pause.) You did see us, didn't you?

How does this conversation go in Act II?

What is the significance?

• In Act II of "Waiting for Godot," the conversation between Vladimir and the Boy continues from where it left off in Act I. When the Boy asks the same question as before, Vladimir responds with a sense of frustration, asking the Boy if he remembers seeing him and Estragon the day before. The Boy responds that he does not, and Vladimir becomes increasingly agitated, demanding that the Boy tell Godot that he saw them.
• The significance of this conversation lies in the play's theme of repetition and futility. Vladimir's insistence on being remembered by the Boy and his anger at the Boy's inability to recall the previous day's events highlights the characters' sense of isolation and their struggle to find meaning in their lives. The repetition of the dialogue from Act I also emphasizes the characters' sense of being trapped in a cycle of waiting and uncertainty, unable to break free from their monotonous existence.
• The conversation between Vladimir and the Boy can also be read as a commentary on the nature of memory and perception. The Boy's inability to remember Vladimir and Estragon from the previous day raises questions about the reliability of memory and the subjective nature of perception. It also underscores the characters' desire for human connection and the frustration that comes from being forgotten or ignored.

1.4. In both Acts, evening falls into night and moon rises. How would you interpret this ‘coming of night and moon’ when actually they are waiting for Godot?

• The arrival of evening and the rising of the moon in both Acts of "Waiting for Godot" serve as a powerful symbol of the characters' sense of isolation and their existential struggle. As Vladimir and Estragon wait for Godot, the passing of time is marked by the gradual darkening of the sky and the increasing brightness of the moon, creating a sense of emptiness and desolation.
• The coming of night and moon can be interpreted in different ways. On one hand, it can be seen as a symbol of the characters' uncertainty and their fear of the unknown. As darkness descends and the moon rises, the characters become increasingly anxious and unsure of what the future holds. This sense of uncertainty is exacerbated by the fact that they are waiting for Godot, whose arrival and purpose are never fully explained.
• On the other hand, the coming of night and moon can also be read as a symbol of the characters' hope and resilience. Despite the darkness and emptiness that surrounds them, Vladimir and Estragon continue to wait for Godot, holding on to the belief that he will arrive and bring some kind of meaning or purpose to their lives. The moon, which is traditionally associated with renewal and new beginnings, can be seen as a symbol of the characters' resilience and their willingness to keep waiting and hoping, even in the face of overwhelming uncertainty and despair.

1.5. What is the meaning of the terms ‘Apathia, Aphasia and Athambia’ in Lucky’s speech? “. . . divine apathia divine athambia divine aphasia loves us dearly with some exceptions for reasons unknown …”

• Apathia is a sub syndrome consists the symptoms of fatigue, concentration lack of interests etc. Aphasia is a disorder that affects how you communicate. Athambia means impartibility, to be incapable of being upset or not easily excited. With all these meaning in Lucky's speech he calls divine Apathia, Aphasia and Athambia that divine don't want to talk and has lack interest in talking and he loves us with some exactions for unknown reasons.
• In Lucky's speech, he describes these concepts as "divine," which suggests a religious or spiritual connotation. Lucky suggests that these divine qualities, including apathia, aphasia, and athambia, are being directed towards the characters in the play, and that they are being loved "with some exceptions for reasons unknown." This suggests that the characters are subject to forces beyond their control, and that they are experiencing a sense of futility and confusion in the face of these forces.
• The use of these terms in Lucky's speech can be seen as a commentary on the human condition and the limitations of language and communication. The fact that these divine qualities are described as negative attributes, such as apathy and lack of communication, suggests a sense of disillusionment or disappointment with the world and the divine forces that govern it.

1.6.‘A better solution to the tramp’s predicament than to wait – is, suicide”. Is it really so? Why they fail to commit suicide?

• In "Waiting for Godot," the idea of suicide is mentioned several times by the characters, most notably by Estragon, who suggests that suicide may be a better solution to their predicament than waiting for Godot. However, the characters ultimately fail to follow through on this suggestion, and the reasons for their failure are complex and open to interpretation.
• The characters fail to commit suicide one can interpret as a reflection of their lack of agency and control over their own lives. The fact that they are unable to take decisive action, even when faced with a seemingly hopeless situation, underscores their sense of helplessness and futility. This is further emphasized by the fact that they continue to wait for Godot, despite his absence and their uncertainty about his identity and intentions.
• The characters inability to commit suicide can also be seen as a symbol of their resilience and their unwillingness to give up in the face of adversity. Despite their despair and disillusionment, they continue to cling to the hope that something better may come along, and they persist in their quest for meaning and purpose.

1.7. Explain: “Godot might become as image of what Sartre calls “Bad Faith””.

• In "Waiting for Godot," the character of Godot is a mysterious figure who never appears on stage, and his true identity and intentions remain unclear throughout the play. But some critics have interpreted Godot as a symbol of what the philosopher Jean-Paul Sartre called "Bad Faith."
• According to Sartre, Bad Faith is a form of self-deception in which individuals deny their own freedom and responsibility, and instead adopt false beliefs and attitudes in order to avoid the anxiety and uncertainty of making choices and taking action. In the context of "Waiting for Godot," the characters endless waiting for Godot can be seen as a form of Bad Faith, in which they deny their own agency and responsibility and instead cling to the hope that someone or something else will provide meaning and purpose in their lives.
• By interpreting Godot as a symbol of Bad Faith, the play highlights the dangers of relying on external forces or authorities to provide meaning and purpose in our lives. The characters futile wait for Godot serves as a cautionary tale about the perils of giving up our own agency and responsibility, and the importance of taking action and making choices, even in the face of uncertainty and anxiety.

1.8. Explain: “One hardly feels the absurdity of some things, on the one hand, and the necessity of those other things, on the other, (for it is rare that feeling of absurdity is not followed by the feeling of necessity), when one feels the absurdity of those things of which one had just felt the necessity (for it is rare that the feeling of necessity is not followed by the feeling of absurdity)”

• This quote from "Waiting for Godot" reflects the play's overarching themes of existentialism and the absurdity of human existence. The speaker is suggesting that sometimes we feel a sense of absurdity and meaninglessness in life, and at other times we feel a sense of necessity and purpose. However, these two feelings are often intertwined and can alternate rapidly, leading to a sense of confusion and disorientation.
• The speaker notes that it is rare for a feeling of absurdity not to be followed by a feeling of necessity, and vice versa. This suggests that even when we recognize the absurdity of our existence and the meaningless of certain things, we still feel a sense of necessity and urgency in our lives. Conversely, when we feel a sense of purpose and meaning in our lives, we may also recognize the absurdity of certain situations or beliefs.
• The quote highlights the paradoxical nature of human existence and the constant tension between meaning and absurdity. It suggests that the human experience is often marked by confusion and contradiction, as we try to reconcile our sense of purpose and necessity with the absurdity of the world around us.

WORK CITED:-

👉Esslin, Martin J.. "Samuel Beckett". Encyclopedia Britannica, 18 Dec. 2022, https://www.britannica.com/biography/Samuel-Beckett.

NOTE:- If you find any problem or question or suggestions please let me know☺️.

Words:- 2112