Existentialism: Flipped Learning

TOPIC OF THE BLOG:-

This blog is a part of a thinking activity given by Dilip Barad Sir from The English Department, MKBU, Bhavnagar. Check out Dilip Barad sir's Blog Site (Click here) for more information and knowledge about Existentialism and Flipped Learning and other works and writers. In this blog I like to tell something about Existentialism (with the help of videos given in the Teacher's Blog (Click here)) and Flipped Learning as per my understanding. So, mostly we heard about Literature and things but something new entered in the world of Literature and learning called Flipped Learning so, let's see what this thing is about.

FLIPPED LEARNING: Flipped learning is a methodology that helps teachers to prioritize active learning during class time by assigning students lecture materials and presentations to be viewed at home or outside of class. To know more about Flipped Learning visit this site (Click here).

EXISTENTIALISM:-

VIDEO - 1 (What is Existentialism?)

According to this video. It is believed that Existentialism starts with by Kierkegaard but there are so many other Philosopher and Existentialists too such as Dostoyevsky, Kafka, Heidegger, Nietzsche, Sartre, Shetsov, Hesse, Beauvior, etc. who contributed in this movement. For all of them of course points of view are different but they all believe in basic thought which is individuality along with passion and freedom. According to Camus, to believe in God is philosophical Suicide. Existentialism mostly popular among youth because its cover most common subjects like passion, emotion, suicide, anguish, absurdity, death, freedom etc.

VIDEO - 2 (The Myth of Sisyphus: The Absurd Reasoning (Feeling of the Absurd))

When we say Absurdity we first think of Albert Camus who gave ideas on this thought very deeply. He begins this essay by saying that 'There is but one truly serious philosophical problem and that is suicide.' Further more he says that 'I see so many people dying because they find life worthless, We are concerned here, at the outset, with the relationship between individuals thoughts on suicide and act like this is prepared within the Silence of the heart, as is a great work of art.' In simple words when a person finds that life has no meaning, he suddenly realised that this feeling is called absurdity, naturally after this he likes death more than life. According to Camus, In truth, there is no necessary common measure between these two judgements. For the question emerging, Is there any logic to the point of death? He answered, I cannot know unless I pursue, without reckless passion, in the sole light of evidence, the reasoning of which I am here suggesting the source. This is what I called an absurd reasoning.

VIDEO - 3: (The Myth of Sisyphus: the notion of philosophical suicide)

Indeed life is absurd, most of the people do not hesitate to reflect upon life to see its absurdity but those who try to escape from it by committee what Camus called Philosophical Suicide. There are only two ways to escape from this absurdity, one is to do physical suicide and end this life and second is denial of this absurdity and committing philosophical suicide. According to Camus, he doesn't recognise him as an existentialist though he was part of that movement. He says that Existentialists do recognise the absurd but instead of embracing it they suggest escaping it. He says, 'I am taking the liberty at this point of calling the existential attitude philosophical society.' 

VIDEO - 4: (Dadaism, Nihilism and Existentialism)

Dadaism was an art movement that emerged in the early 20th century, around the time of World War I. Dadaism was a response to the horrors and absurdities of war, and it rejected traditional artistic and cultural values in favor of a more anarchic and subversive approach. Nihilism is a philosophical belief that life and the universe have no inherent meaning or value. Nihilists reject the existence of any objective moral or ethical standards, and they believe that all human endeavors are ultimately futile. Artists like Hugo Ball, Janco, Jean Arp, Tristan Tzara, etc who were disgusted by the war moved to Zurich and founded the Dada Movement, they say Creation isn't the primary goal of Dadaism, Dadaism is not about art and being artistic rather it's merely and art movement. Nietzsche described this movement, Whom do they hate most? Him who breaks up their tables of values, the breaker, the lawbreaker. He, however, is the creator. Hugo Ball in his manifesto writes, how can one get rid of everything that smacks of journalism, worms, everything nice and right, blinkered, moralistic, europeanised, enervated? By saying dada. Further he says that 'I don't want words that other people have invented.' In short, Dadaism has nothing to do with existentialism and nihilism, it is a response for WWI.

VIDEO - 5: (Existentialism - a gloomy philosophy)

Existentialism is a philosophical movement that emphasizes individual existence and freedom, and the search for meaning in a seemingly meaningless and chaotic world. It emerged in the 20th century, particularly in Europe after the devastation of World War II. According to different Philosophers of the field, it should be you who judge every value in choosing your own meaning in life, and after doing that you should accept the result of your choice and consequences. Another point is to be noted that Existentialism isn't Narcissist Philosophy. Existentialism leads us to Nihilism but Existentialism isn't Nihilism. Existentialism is a movement which is a response to the World War where despair and absurdity linked every corner for every individual, so, Existentialism is a response to this emptiness. After WWII it was Existentialism who came as a cure for those who feel life is meaningless.

VIDEO - 6: (Existentialism and Nihilism: Is it one and the same?)

Existentialism and Nihilism are totally different ideas, every existentialist fights against Nihilism. For Kierkegaard, Nihilism can be defined as the loss of individuality. For Nietzsche, Nihilism is that the highest values devalue themselves. 

Emil Cioran writes, "At twenty we rage against the heavens and the filth they hide; then we grow tired of it. The tragic attitudes suit only an extent and ridicules puberty." (Regier)

In contrast to this attitude Camus wrote 'The Myth of Sisyphus' and 'The Rebel' to argue why rebellion is the only proper to the absurdity of life.

VIDEO - 7: (Let us introduce Existentialism again!)

Existentialism is not a philosophical system nor should it even be viewed as a set of doctrines rather it is probably best classified as a philosophical movement as a movement existentialism arose in 19th Century Europe. Robert Solomon expressed it in his work from Hegel to existentialism, Existentialism is an attitude that recognizes the unresolvable confusion of the human world. Existentialists all share a common concern with what some have termed the human condition. Existentialist thinkers have differed widely on their evaluations of the human condition. Religious and philosophical systems which offer such definitive answers to life's questions. While facing the human condition and life's inescapable problems as an individual without the assistance of a pre-made religion or philosophically. Existentialists are largely in favor of individuals finding answers to life's problems on their own. 

The idea of being able to freely choose standards of value and create meaning and purpose in one's own life is closely related to another famous existential idea that for humans existence precedes essence. This idea was put forth by Jean-Paul Sartre in a lecture he gave in 1945 titled "Existentialism a humanism".

The concept of an essence is put forth most famously in the work of the ancient Greek Philosopher, Aristotle. Aristotle believed that every substance or in other words every independent thing be it a person, a rock or a tree has an essence. The essence of a substance is also sometimes referred to as its nature and Can be seen as the necessary properties or characteristics which are essential for the thing to be what it is.

A poetic warning by Nietzsche, "Injustice and filth they throw after the lonely one but my brother if you would be a star you must not shine less for them because of that and Beware of the good and the just they like to crucify those who invent their own virtue for themselves - they hate the lonely one.

VIDEO - 8: (Explain like I'm Five: Existentialism and Nietzsche)

This is a fun loving kind of video which gave basic idea about Existentialism. First one is According to Nietzsche, We should make our own rules and live up to that. Then he gave the idea about what Ubermensch is? In simple words, It is a word in German that means Superman who can do whatever he wants to do. 

VIDEO - 9: (Why I like Existentialism? Eric Dodson)

In this video Eric Dodson discusses his point of view about Existentialism. According to him, Existentialism has two sides. The first one deals with an obvious side which has specific ideas and specialised vocabulary and the second deals with deeper thought about the way of life or sense of existential way to live. Existentialism affects the mind and heart both. Furthermore, he likes that Existentialism or existentialists are much more straightforward than average and they are not afraid of talking The dark side of existentialism which deals with Anxiety and death. Existentialism accepts how we are in the context of Holism. Existentialism has a rebellious way of thinking for the sake of understanding things better and more deeply. With a deeply understanding of existentialism he talks about how existentialism affects him and he gives the idea that before knowing existentialism he was thinking for the sake of doing things but now for him sometimes thinking feels more like waves of passion. Existentialism has the ideas of Buddhism and with that existentialism is teaching compassion too. Existentialism helps to be aware of our own suffering which makes us know about the suffering of others. Existentialism teaches him to live moment by moment in a deeper way. To understand more deeply he also gave us 10 things to do to live more Existentially.

1. Remember that you are born to a brilliant and terrifying universe
2. Build responsible community
3. Recover the ability to play
4. Inhabit the present moment
5. Learn to live with passion
6. See how free you can be
7. Lay claim to your power in life
8. Honor life's difficult experiences
9. Start relating to the big picture
10. Question what you have been told

This video ends with an idea that, remember you are human which in itself extraordinary and brilliant destiny. 

VIDEO - 10: (Let us sum up: From Essentialism to Existentialism)

This video starts with the idea about Philosophy that Philosophy is about the dialectic; someone puts forth an idea, and then someone else responds to it. Plato and Aristotle tells us that everything has an essence which makes a particular thing that thing and gives it purpose and also that essence exists before us. But Philosophers and Writers like Friedrich Nietzsche and Jean-Paul Sartre give their own ideas about Nihilism and return to the question of essence and ask what if we exist first? And what if we are born to find our own essence? These become the framework for what we now know as Existentialism. Existentialism is connected with absurdity, some can think absurdity as something just silly or preposterous but for Existentialists, absurdity is a technical term which means the search for answers in an answerless world. One of the key ideas in existentialism is the concept of "authenticity." Authenticity refers to living in accordance with one's own values and beliefs, rather than conforming to societal expectations or living a life that is inauthentic. According to existentialists, living an authentic life is essential to achieving true happiness and fulfillment.

WORKS CITED:-

• Regier, Willis G. “Cioran’s Insomnia.” MLN, vol. 119, no. 5, 2004, pp. 994–1012. JSTOR, http://www.jstor.org/stable/3251887

NOTE:- If you find any problem or question or suggestions please let me know☺️.

Words:- 1986

Waiting for Godot by Samuel Beckett

TOPIC OF THE BLOG:-

This blog is a part of a thinking activity on Waiting for Godot by Samuel Beckett given by Dilip Barad Sir from The English Department, MKBU, Bhavnagar. Check out Dilip Barad sir's Blog Site (Click here) for more information and knowledge about Waiting for Godot by Samuel Beckett and other works and writers. In this blog I am going to answer some questions given by Dilip sir in  Teacher's Blog (Click here).

SAMUEL BECKETT:-

You're on Earth, There's 

no cure for that.

Samuel Barclay Beckett was born on April 13?, 1906 in Foxrock, County Dublin, Ireland and died on December 22, 1989 in Paris, France. He was an author, critic, and playwright, winner of the Nobel Prize for Literature in 1969. He wrote in both French and English and is perhaps best known for his plays, especially 'En attendant Godot' (1952; Waiting for Godot). (Esslin)

QUESTIONS - ANSWERS OF THIS PLAY:- 

1.1. Why does Beckett grow a few leaves in Act II on the barren tree - The tree has four or five leaves?

• In the play Waiting for Godot, the appearance of a few leaves on the previously barren tree in Act II can be interpreted in different ways, depending on the reader's interpretation.
• One possible interpretation is that the leaves symbolize a glimmer of hope and renewal in an otherwise bleak and desolate world. The tree, which previously had no leaves, now has a few, indicating that life and growth are still possible, even in difficult circumstances. This could be seen as a metaphor for the human condition, where even in the midst of despair and uncertainty, there is always the potential for change and growth.
• Another interpretation is that the leaves are a mocking gesture, meant to taunt the characters who are waiting for someone or something to come and save them. The appearance of a few leaves may suggest that the tree is teasing the characters, offering them a small glimpse of hope only to take it away again, reinforcing the idea that their waiting is pointless and futile.

1.2.  Can we do any political reading of the play if we see European nations represented by the 'names' of the characters (Vladimir - Russia; Estragon - France; Pozzo - Italy and Lucky - England)? What interpretation can be inferred from the play written just after World War II? Which country stands for 'Godot'?

• Samuel Beckett's plays are renowned for their ambiguity and openness to interpretation. One can argue that political interpretation is a possible lens through which to view his works. For instance, his play "Waiting for Godot," written just after World War II, has been read in various ways. Some critics have suggested that the characters of Vladimir and Estragon could represent Russia and France, respectively, while Pozzo could be interpreted as Italy and Lucky as England.
• The interpretation of Godot as Germany and Hitler is another reading that has been proposed. In this view, Godot represents the destructive force of Germany, which caused widespread devastation during the war. The characters waiting for Godot, who are portrayed as soldiers and dictators, can be seen as a commentary on the blind devotion and loyalty of those who supported Hitler's regime. The play's title itself, "Waiting for Godot," can be read as a metaphor for the way in which people waited for Hitler to deliver them from their troubles.
• While this political interpretation is plausible, it is important to note that Beckett himself did not explicitly endorse it. The play's openness to multiple interpretations is what makes it a classic of modern drama. Ultimately, the meaning of "Waiting for Godot" is left up to the reader to decide, and different readers may find different meanings in the play's enigmatic characters and situations.

1.3. In Act I, in reply to Boy’s question:

BOY: What am I to tell Mr. Godot, Sir?

VLADIMIR: Tell him . . . (he hesitates) . . . tell him you saw us. (Pause.) You did see us, didn't you?

How does this conversation go in Act II?

What is the significance?

• In Act II of "Waiting for Godot," the conversation between Vladimir and the Boy continues from where it left off in Act I. When the Boy asks the same question as before, Vladimir responds with a sense of frustration, asking the Boy if he remembers seeing him and Estragon the day before. The Boy responds that he does not, and Vladimir becomes increasingly agitated, demanding that the Boy tell Godot that he saw them.
• The significance of this conversation lies in the play's theme of repetition and futility. Vladimir's insistence on being remembered by the Boy and his anger at the Boy's inability to recall the previous day's events highlights the characters' sense of isolation and their struggle to find meaning in their lives. The repetition of the dialogue from Act I also emphasizes the characters' sense of being trapped in a cycle of waiting and uncertainty, unable to break free from their monotonous existence.
• The conversation between Vladimir and the Boy can also be read as a commentary on the nature of memory and perception. The Boy's inability to remember Vladimir and Estragon from the previous day raises questions about the reliability of memory and the subjective nature of perception. It also underscores the characters' desire for human connection and the frustration that comes from being forgotten or ignored.

1.4. In both Acts, evening falls into night and moon rises. How would you interpret this ‘coming of night and moon’ when actually they are waiting for Godot?

• The arrival of evening and the rising of the moon in both Acts of "Waiting for Godot" serve as a powerful symbol of the characters' sense of isolation and their existential struggle. As Vladimir and Estragon wait for Godot, the passing of time is marked by the gradual darkening of the sky and the increasing brightness of the moon, creating a sense of emptiness and desolation.
• The coming of night and moon can be interpreted in different ways. On one hand, it can be seen as a symbol of the characters' uncertainty and their fear of the unknown. As darkness descends and the moon rises, the characters become increasingly anxious and unsure of what the future holds. This sense of uncertainty is exacerbated by the fact that they are waiting for Godot, whose arrival and purpose are never fully explained.
• On the other hand, the coming of night and moon can also be read as a symbol of the characters' hope and resilience. Despite the darkness and emptiness that surrounds them, Vladimir and Estragon continue to wait for Godot, holding on to the belief that he will arrive and bring some kind of meaning or purpose to their lives. The moon, which is traditionally associated with renewal and new beginnings, can be seen as a symbol of the characters' resilience and their willingness to keep waiting and hoping, even in the face of overwhelming uncertainty and despair.

1.5. What is the meaning of the terms ‘Apathia, Aphasia and Athambia’ in Lucky’s speech? “. . . divine apathia divine athambia divine aphasia loves us dearly with some exceptions for reasons unknown …”

• Apathia is a sub syndrome consists the symptoms of fatigue, concentration lack of interests etc. Aphasia is a disorder that affects how you communicate. Athambia means impartibility, to be incapable of being upset or not easily excited. With all these meaning in Lucky's speech he calls divine Apathia, Aphasia and Athambia that divine don't want to talk and has lack interest in talking and he loves us with some exactions for unknown reasons.
• In Lucky's speech, he describes these concepts as "divine," which suggests a religious or spiritual connotation. Lucky suggests that these divine qualities, including apathia, aphasia, and athambia, are being directed towards the characters in the play, and that they are being loved "with some exceptions for reasons unknown." This suggests that the characters are subject to forces beyond their control, and that they are experiencing a sense of futility and confusion in the face of these forces.
• The use of these terms in Lucky's speech can be seen as a commentary on the human condition and the limitations of language and communication. The fact that these divine qualities are described as negative attributes, such as apathy and lack of communication, suggests a sense of disillusionment or disappointment with the world and the divine forces that govern it.

1.6.‘A better solution to the tramp’s predicament than to wait – is, suicide”. Is it really so? Why they fail to commit suicide?

• In "Waiting for Godot," the idea of suicide is mentioned several times by the characters, most notably by Estragon, who suggests that suicide may be a better solution to their predicament than waiting for Godot. However, the characters ultimately fail to follow through on this suggestion, and the reasons for their failure are complex and open to interpretation.
• The characters fail to commit suicide one can interpret as a reflection of their lack of agency and control over their own lives. The fact that they are unable to take decisive action, even when faced with a seemingly hopeless situation, underscores their sense of helplessness and futility. This is further emphasized by the fact that they continue to wait for Godot, despite his absence and their uncertainty about his identity and intentions.
• The characters inability to commit suicide can also be seen as a symbol of their resilience and their unwillingness to give up in the face of adversity. Despite their despair and disillusionment, they continue to cling to the hope that something better may come along, and they persist in their quest for meaning and purpose.

1.7. Explain: “Godot might become as image of what Sartre calls “Bad Faith””.

• In "Waiting for Godot," the character of Godot is a mysterious figure who never appears on stage, and his true identity and intentions remain unclear throughout the play. But some critics have interpreted Godot as a symbol of what the philosopher Jean-Paul Sartre called "Bad Faith."
• According to Sartre, Bad Faith is a form of self-deception in which individuals deny their own freedom and responsibility, and instead adopt false beliefs and attitudes in order to avoid the anxiety and uncertainty of making choices and taking action. In the context of "Waiting for Godot," the characters endless waiting for Godot can be seen as a form of Bad Faith, in which they deny their own agency and responsibility and instead cling to the hope that someone or something else will provide meaning and purpose in their lives.
• By interpreting Godot as a symbol of Bad Faith, the play highlights the dangers of relying on external forces or authorities to provide meaning and purpose in our lives. The characters futile wait for Godot serves as a cautionary tale about the perils of giving up our own agency and responsibility, and the importance of taking action and making choices, even in the face of uncertainty and anxiety.

1.8. Explain: “One hardly feels the absurdity of some things, on the one hand, and the necessity of those other things, on the other, (for it is rare that feeling of absurdity is not followed by the feeling of necessity), when one feels the absurdity of those things of which one had just felt the necessity (for it is rare that the feeling of necessity is not followed by the feeling of absurdity)”

• This quote from "Waiting for Godot" reflects the play's overarching themes of existentialism and the absurdity of human existence. The speaker is suggesting that sometimes we feel a sense of absurdity and meaninglessness in life, and at other times we feel a sense of necessity and purpose. However, these two feelings are often intertwined and can alternate rapidly, leading to a sense of confusion and disorientation.
• The speaker notes that it is rare for a feeling of absurdity not to be followed by a feeling of necessity, and vice versa. This suggests that even when we recognize the absurdity of our existence and the meaningless of certain things, we still feel a sense of necessity and urgency in our lives. Conversely, when we feel a sense of purpose and meaning in our lives, we may also recognize the absurdity of certain situations or beliefs.
• The quote highlights the paradoxical nature of human existence and the constant tension between meaning and absurdity. It suggests that the human experience is often marked by confusion and contradiction, as we try to reconcile our sense of purpose and necessity with the absurdity of the world around us.

WORK CITED:-

👉Esslin, Martin J.. "Samuel Beckett". Encyclopedia Britannica, 18 Dec. 2022, https://www.britannica.com/biography/Samuel-Beckett.

NOTE:- If you find any problem or question or suggestions please let me know☺️.

Words:- 2112

Virginia Woolf’s Orlando - A Biography

TOPIC OF THE BLOG:-

This blog is a part of a thinking activity given by Megha ma'am from The English Department, MKBU, Bhavnagar. Check out Megha Trivedi's Blog (Click here) for more information and knowledge about Virginia Woolf, Orlando and other works and writers. In this blog I am going to explain my point of view about Virginia Woolf, Orlando and how it also has connections and differences between Movie.

VIRGINIA WOOLF:-

Virginia Woolf (1882-1941) was an English writer and one of the most important literary figures of the 20th century. She was a pioneer of modernist literature, known for her stream-of-consciousness style and exploration of complex themes such as gender, sexuality, and mental health.

Woolf was born in London and grew up in a prominent intellectual family. Her father was a writer and her mother was a model for Pre-Raphaelite painters. Woolf began writing in her early twenties and quickly became a member of the Bloomsbury Group, a group of artists and intellectuals who revolutionized British culture in the early 20th century. Woolf's most famous works include the novels "Mrs. Dalloway," "To the Lighthouse," and "Orlando," as well as the non-fiction works "A Room of One's Own" and "Three Guineas."

Her writing is characterized by its lyrical prose, experimental style, and exploration of themes such as the nature of consciousness, the complexities of human relationships, and the impact of societal norms on individuals.

Woolf also struggled with mental health issues throughout her life and ultimately died by suicide in 1941. Despite her short life, Woolf's contributions to literature have had a lasting impact and her work continues to be celebrated and studied today.

SIMILARITIES AND DIFRENCES BETWEEN VIRGINIA WOOLF AND ORLANDO MOVIES:-

Here is a trailer of the movie Vita and Virginia:-

"Orlando" and "Vita and Virginia" are both films based on the works of Virginia Woolf and explore themes of gender, sexuality, and artistic expression. "Orlando" was released in 1992 and directed by Sally Potter, while "Vita and Virginia" was released in 2018 and directed by Chanya Button.

One of the primary similarities between the two films is that they both depict non-traditional relationships and challenge traditional gender roles. In "Orlando," the protagonist changes gender and lives for over 400 years, while in "Vita and Virginia," the love affair between Woolf and Sackville-West defies societal norms of the time.

Additionally, both films showcase the artistic talents of Woolf and Sackville-West, as well as their struggles with mental health. "Orlando" is an adaptation of Woolf's novel of the same name, while "Vita and Virginia" focuses on the relationship between Woolf and Sackville-West during their creative peaks.

However, there are also some key differences between the two films. "Orlando" is more fantastical and experimental in its narrative structure, while "Vita and Virginia" is a more straightforward biographical drama. Additionally, "Orlando" is set over a much longer period of time than "Vita and Virginia," which takes place over a few years.

In terms of visuals, "Orlando" is more visually stunning and stylized, with elaborate costume design and cinematography, while "Vita and Virginia" is more conquer and focuses more on the emotional and intellectual depth of the characters.

Here are some Questions asked in Vaidahi Ma'am's Blog (Click here):-

💥How far do you feel that Orlando is influenced by Vita and Virginia’s love affair? Does it talk only about that or do you find anything else too?

While Virginia Woolf's novel "Orlando" was influenced by her relationship with Vita Sackville-West, the novel is not solely focused on their love affair. Instead, it uses the character of Orlando to explore questions of gender, sexuality, identity, and the nature of time. The novel also features elements of social commentary, particularly in its critique of the limitations placed on women in society.

"Orlando" is a complex and multifaceted work of literature that goes beyond just the portrayal of Woolf's relationship with Sackville-West. It explores a wide range of themes and ideas, including the challenges faced by women in a male-dominated society, and continues to be celebrated and studied for its innovative style and exploration of complex themes.

💥Who do you think is confused about their identity Vita or Virginia?

Both Vita Sackville-West and Virginia Woolf were individuals who explored questions of identity and the complexities of human relationships in their lives and works. In the case of Vita Sackville-West, her gender identity was complicated by her attraction to women and her rejection of traditional feminine roles. She often dressed in men's clothing and had relationships with women throughout her life. In her writing, she explored these themes through her novel "Challenge," which tells the story of a young woman who falls in love with another woman and must navigate societal expectations and her own sense of self.

Virginia Woolf, on the other hand, grappled with questions of mental health and the impact of societal norms on individuals. She struggled with depression and ultimately died by suicide, and her writing often explores the complexities of human relationships and the inner lives of her characters. In "Mrs. Dalloway," for example, she portrays the inner thoughts and emotions of a woman preparing for a party, highlighting the complexity of human experience and the impact of societal expectations on individual lives.

💥What is society’s thought about women and identity? Do you agree with them? If Yes then why? If no then why?

Society's thoughts about women and identity have varied over time and across cultures. However, historically, women have often been expected to conform to traditional gender roles and norms, limiting their freedom and individual expression. This has led to significant challenges for women in terms of developing their own sense of identity and living fulfilling lives.

It is important to acknowledge that many individuals and groups have challenged traditional gender roles and advocated for greater freedom and acceptance of diverse identities. This includes movements such as feminism and LGBTQ+ rights, which have worked to empower individuals and promote greater equality and inclusivity in society. Ultimately, it is up to individuals to determine their own identities and to live according to their own values and beliefs, free from the constraints of societal norms and expectations.

💥What are your views on Gender Identity? Will you like to give any message to society?

It is important for society to recognize and accept diverse gender identities and to create a culture of inclusivity and acceptance for all individuals, regardless of their gender identity. Everyone deserves to be treated with respect and dignity, and to be allowed to express their identity in a safe and supportive environment. It is important to educate ourselves and others about gender identity and to work towards creating a more equitable and just society for all individuals.

💥Write a note on the direction of the movie. Which symbols and space caught your attention while watching the movie?

The director of a movie is responsible for bringing the script to life through visual storytelling. This involves making decisions about camera angles, lighting, pacing, and other elements that contribute to the overall look and feel of the film. A skilled director can use these tools to create a compelling narrative and to convey important themes and messages to the audience.

In terms of symbols and space, these are important elements of visual storytelling that can contribute to the overall meaning of a film. For example, a director may use specific colors or objects to represent certain themes or ideas, or they may use the physical space of the film to convey a sense of isolation or confinement. These elements can help to create a sense of atmosphere and to deepen the emotional impact of the film on the viewer.

The direction of a film plays a crucial role in its success and can greatly influence the way that the story is told and perceived by the audience. A skilled director can use visual elements to create a powerful and engaging film that resonates with viewers on a deep and emotional level.

💥"Vita and Virginia" had to be made into Bollywood Adaptation, who do you think would be fit for the role of Vita and Virginia?

For the role of Vita, an actor who can capture her unconventional spirit and distinctive style may be a good fit. Someone like Kangana Ranaut, who has played strong and unconventional characters in films like "Queen" and "Tanu Weds Manu Returns," may be a good fit for this role.

For the role of Virginia, an actor who can convey the complexity and depth of her character would be important. An actress like Deepika Padukone, who has played nuanced and emotionally complex characters in films like "Piku" and "Chhapaak," may be a good fit for this role.

NOTE:- If you find any problem or question or suggestions please let me know☺️.

Words:- 1468